Your Black Life: How To Accept It’s A Post-Racial Society

By: Dom Apollon

How to Accept It’s a Post-Racial Society (a.k.a., How You Can Learn to Stop Making Excuses, Throw Away All Your Race Cards and Accept We Are Living in a Post-Racial Society)

Reprinted From Race Wire

If you’re like me, you justifiably shed tears at the incredible symbolic power unleashed this week when Americans chose Barack Hussein Obama to be our 44th president. Moreover, his victory speech rightfully reminded us after eight years in the Bush wilderness that indeed “our union can be perfected.” That there is genuine “hope for what we can and must achieve tomorrow,” and the progress we can make for our children in the next 100 years of American history.

I must admit, though, by the next day I felt rather daunted by the enormity of that task. So I was relieved to discover through the searingly insightful analysis provided recently by some conservatives that, as far as continued progress in racial justice is concerned, we are finally off the hook.

Yes indeed, with Obama’s election, “America has completed its evolution into a racial meritocracy,” wrote Phillip Morris of the Cleveland Plains Dealer. Our country, according to Jonathan Kay of the National Post, “has finally become a fundamentally post-racial society,” where in fact, Laura Hollis tells us at townhall.com, “racism is dead.”

But if you are still mired in white guilt, or are one of those stubborn “race-obsessed” types who doesn’t believe that the remaining racial chasms in education, income and wealth, health care, criminal justice enforcement, yackety schmakety blasé blah can’t entirely be explained by, well, minority laziness and lack of initiative, don’t fret.

I’m developing a handy guide to help you navigate the new world that awaits you at the stroke of noon on January 20, 2009. I’m calling it, “How You Can Learn to Stop Making Excuses, Throw Away All Your Race Cards and Accept That We Are Living in a Post-Racial Society.”

It will be a pocket-sized book full of quotes from those who have evolved to a pure state of total colorblindness. These quotes will remind readers of the inexhaustible cure-all that was the 2008 presidential election:

In the coming months, for example, you might find yourself worried that Black, Latino, and American Indian kids are far more likely to attend public schools with substandard textbooks, less qualified teachers, and woefully under-funded budgets. Should this occur, just open your guide to the Education Section, where you’ll find nuggets of wisdom like this one from Reagan-era Education Tsar Bill Bennett: “I’ll tell you one thing that [Obama’s election] means, you don’t take any more excuses from anybody who says ‘The deck is stacked,’ ‘I can’t do anything,’ ‘There’s so much in-built this and that.’” Did you get that? According to Bennett, it is perfectly sensible to extrapolate from Obama’s individual educational and electoral achievements to conclude that no one can ever again claim that systemic resource deficiencies affect racial outcomes. I mean, “in-built this and that” is so Jim Crow. “There are always problems in a big society,” he so cogently reminds us.

But if that doesn’t make you feel better, be patient, and before you know it you’ll be lobbying Congress with me to change our national motto from E pluribus unum to Electus unum abandonae pluribus. The power of this logic isn’t limited to education.

Take, for example, the skyrocketing foreclosure rates currently ravaging many of those very same communities with these low-performing schools. When you find yourself getting indigestion thinking about today’s massive evaporation of African American and Latino wealth – in large part the product of predatory refinancing loans targeted at older homeowners who needed emergency cash – well, reading additional quotes about the power of Obama’s triumph will be the best antacid your declining real wages can buy. According to the Wall St. Journal the “One promise of his victory is that perhaps we can put to rest the myth of racism as a barrier to achievement in this splendid country. Mr. Obama has a special obligation to help do so.”

Ah great idea. The Obama Administration could use a new Cabinet-level position devoted to ridding our society of that pesky racism myth. It only clutters our simple, tacit interpretation of data such as $0.62 on the $1.00: roughly, the stagnant median family income for Latinos, Blacks, and American Indians compared to white families for at least the last seven years. What other explanation do we need beyond the well-understood notion that people of color are historically about 62% as hard-working as whites? Now that a majority-white America has demonstrated its inclusiveness at the polls, it should be self-evident that remaining effects of past and current discrimination in hiring, salaries, and promotion throughout our economy are illusions that have long since disintegrated.

But in case it’s not self-evident, my booklet will include defiant quotes from folks like Former UN Ambassador John Bolton, who got a little testy last week on the BBC when explaining what electing the first African American president should mean: “It is a very significant historical fact. And I take it therefore around the world, criticism of the United States for being a ‘racist’ nation will now stop. Right?”

You tell ‘em, John! And while we’re taking leaps of logic, I’ll go one better with respect to the snooty Europeans: until those hypocritical, socialist wealth redistributors have elected a leader of Barack Hussein Obama’s skin tone, I see no reason to look toward their societies for any policy ideas or values – health care, in particular. As our lame duck Decider in the White House has said, we have the “best health care system in the world,” so why commit as a nation to tackling the persistent racial inequities in health outcomes, in healthy work and home environments and in access to affordable health care?

There’s no need, my friends, because the Obama milestone single-handedly provides Americans with a clear record of colorblindness that inoculates us from any systemic blame in any sector of society where the “race complainers” cry foul. It really makes you wonder why people of color didn’t think of this electoral inclusiveness thing before.

Better late than never, though. And as far as current racial inequities are concerned, we need only follow the wisdom contained in my forthcoming guide, and ignore Obama’s call to continue perfecting our union. Let the “post-racial” happy days roll.

Your Black World: Hope and Wisdom -- Shannon Joyce Prince

Hope and Wisdom

By: Shannon Joyce Prince

Remember back seven years ago to the aftermath of September 11^th, when the world was divided into the good and the axis of evil, those who had democracy and those whose envy of it drove them to murderous fundamentalism? Remember the charge of the extreme right – that anybody who didn't support the ‘War on Terror’ or didn't show the appropriate level of ambivalence towards Islam or Middle Easterners, or paused to quibble over whether or not “enemy countries” had weapons of mass destruction, was unpatriotic and insufficiently American? Remember how the left, the middle, and the moderate right took issue with that kind of Manichean thinking while the war hawks said it didn't matter if those who were leading us to war were honest or which Middle Eastern country we bombed, because we were representing the concepts of freedom and democracy, thus the nitty-gritty about reality and truth weren't important?

I've been stunned to hear that same kind of rhetoric from the left. Either you support President-elect Obama or you're a too cool for school revolutionary snob, a Gloomy Gus, or someone too idealistic, unrealistic, or cynical to be pragmatic or useful. It doesn't matter who Obama is, what he does, says, or stands for - he represents hope and change and that's good enough. The left is currently doing what the right once did: conflating concepts with reality. The right said supporting democracy and freedom and supporting the ‘War on Terror’ were one and the same. The left says supporting hope and change and supporting Barack Obama are one and the same -- and their elision is just as dangerous. Just as by employing the words freedom, equality, and justice the Founding Fathers were able to hide a white, male, propertied oligarchy in the guise and language of democracy, Obama is hiding imperialism, neo-liberalism, and corporatism behind the language of progressivism.

See, there's nothing wrong with hope – as long as the person enjoining you to hope isn't also demanding that you abandon your critical thinking skills. Believe it or not, those of us who criticize Obama are not grumps who enjoy telling children there is no Santa Claus, while merrily kicking puppies. I don't begrudge anyone their elation at this time. When my Creole grandfather, a man who had to leave school in the fifth grade to pick sugarcane, called me nearly in tears that Obama had won the election, I shared his joyful moment with him. I didn't seize that moment to explain that Jason Furhman was heading up Obama's economics team; that as a senator, Obama repeatedly voted to increase funding for the war in Iraq, or tell him about the horrible things Obama has said about black fathers, such as my wonderful grandfather. The problem, however, is that my grandfather supports Obama because he doesn't know those things. Many of the people dancing in the streets right now haven't taken the time to do any research on Obama – so part of their euphoria is based on ignorance. Another significantly large population - much of the black community - supports Obama based on the belief that he is secretly not what he has presented himself to be - that once he has sneaked his way into office he's going to rip apart his button down shirt, revealing a bright Superman "S" and suddenly become Martin Luther King's ideological heir. I've heard another significant faction of people say that it doesn't matter what Obama does or doesn't do, because now little black boys can see a black president and know that they can grow up to be president, too. But that's just it – those little black boys are going to grow up. They're going to analyze and think critically (one hopes) and be affected by Obama's rhetoric and his policies. They're going to need substance, not a symbol. And they deserve better than Obama.

People who say Obama is dangerous, perhaps as dangerous as McCain, aren't crazy. What we realize is that while Obama might, and that's a big might, give in to leftist pressure and pass the kinds of positive legislation he didn't as senator, the benefits of progressive policies he instates risk being undermined by the racist ideology he uses. It's one thing for masses of white people to assume that racism is 90% over. It's another for a black man, Obama, to tell them this is so. Fostering those kinds of illusions is fatal. I've heard it said that Obama is obviously less racist than McCain, and his rural white sycophants, because McCain uses racial slurs and Obama doesn't. That doesn't make Obama less racist – just savvier. It reminds me of how aristocratic slave-owners had a hypocritical disgust for poorer, cruder slave traders, or how you read in many slave-owner narratives that genteel slave-owners proudly called their slaves "servants," instead of slaves. That didn't make the slaves any freer, however. Obama might not call blacks the "n" word, but his descriptions of blacks have depicted them as exactly that. Conversely, Obama may never call Afghans r*gh**ds, but if he starts a war in Afghanistan, Afghan civilians won't be any less dead, and Obama's ability to start a war with Afghanistan might be aided by his genteel language.

You see racists, be they black or white, aren't all as stupid as McCain. As Nancy MacLean noted in her book, Freedom is Not Enough, many racists have gotten hip to equality sounding language. That's why Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action bill was called the California ‘Civil Rights Initiative.’ That's why one racist, nativist, anti-immigration group calls itself Vietnamese for Fair Immigration (though it's run by a white man). Time after time Obama has treated blacks, Muslims, and Middle Easterners with contempt. No matter how beautiful Obama is when he smiles, poised when he debates, or eloquent when he speaks, he is still racist; and his racism, his willingness to undermine minority concerns, his eagerness to appease whites, his enthusiastic obscuring of both past and present issues of justice and equality are perhaps as dangerous to America as anything McCain could do.

As Derrick Bell, the first African American tenured Harvard law professor and one of America's most brilliant legal minds has pointed out, whites tend to allow non-whites to achieve symbolic racial landmarks only when it meets white interests more than black interests; and often by using black figureheads. As blacks place their faith in slow, but sure, racial progress, whites convert old oppressions into more covert forms. Only when blacks are aware of this strategy can they fight for meaningful victories. Interestingly enough, those who criticize Bell tend to do so not because his work is inaccurate, but because it's "depressing." I'm sorry, but my concern isn't being the life of the party -- it's seeking liberation for all people. Those who castigate Americans for not being appropriately jubilant at Obama's election are insisting that blacks content themselves, in perpetuity, with symbolism instead of real change. All those who don't know what Obama stands for, or think he will exhibit qualities contrary to the way he has voted in the Senate and spoken in his speeches, or expect him to be loyal to issues he's flip flopped on, are entitled to do so.

However, it is irresponsible for those of us who believe that hope is only positive when wisely invested, to not use all the research we can gather and all the thought power we can employ, to fight for all people.

Shannon J. Prince is a creative writing major and junior at Dartmouth College. In addition to writing, she is an activist for indigenous and African issues, a ceramics maker, and a travel addict. She has been published in Frodo's Notebook, Falcon Wings, KUHF magazine, Imprint, Rice University's Writers in the Schools Magazine, Illogical Muse, Damn Good Writing, Lost Beat Poetry, Haggard and Halloo, Houston Literary Review, Words on Paper, Bewildering Stories, The Smoking Poet, Muscadine Lines, Ragand, Prick of the Spindle, International Zeitschrift, Conceit Magazine, Snow Monkey, Paradigm, Words Myth, and The Green Muse. She also won Dartmouth's Thomas Ralston Prize for creative writing. Click to e-mail Ms. Prince: Shannon J. Prince