Monday, June 7, 2010

African American Social Commentators Speak - 6/7/10


  • Dr. Boyce Watkins

    Dr. Boyce Watkins

    Author and Finance Professor at Syracuse University

    Rand Paul puts foot in mouth again with MLK comparison

    2:56 PM on 06/07/2010

    OPINION - I am not sure why Rand Paul keeps working to convince black people that he loves us...

    > MORE

  • Earl Ofari Hutchinson

    Earl Ofari Hutchinson

    Journalist, author and broadcaster.

    Why BP keeps stonewalling Obama

    12:32 PM on 06/07/2010

    OPINION - BP's corporate arrogance is made out of cash. It can and has bought its way out of trouble repeatedly and when need be even bought governments...

    > MORE

  • Dr. Boyce Watkins

    Dr. Boyce Watkins

    Author and Finance Professor at Syracuse University

    Arizona isn't the only state with a racist agenda

    9:18 AM on 06/07/2010

    OPINION - The collective outrage expressed over the civil liberties issues in the Arizona immigration law has been hardly present during other more serious racial atrocities...

    > MORE

  • Monique W. Morris

    Monique W. Morris

    Author and VP for Economic Programs, NAACP

    Blacks blocked from serving on Southern juries, study says

    9:13 AM on 06/07/2010

    OPINION - Knowing that this type of discrimination continues is the first step toward holding district attorney's offices accountable for fair treatment...

    > MORE

  • Marcus Vanderberg

    Marcus Vanderberg

    Sports and social commentator

    Record-breaking Ray Allen saves NBA Finals

    8:38 AM on 06/07/2010

    OPINION - If Allen thinks of more things to do to be better, it could spell the end for the Los Angeles Lakers...

    > MORE

  • Clutch Magazine

    Clutch Magazine

    Weekly magazine for young contemporary women of color

    What ladies can learn about men from the NBA playoffs

    10:05 AM on 06/05/2010

    OPINION - But besides the raw comedy, the league is also a great source of education for any woman who has wondered why guys act the way they do...

    > MORE

  • Monique Harden

    Monique Harden

    Co-director of Advocates for Environmental Human Rights

    Can the Gulf Coast still be saved?

    1:08 PM on 06/04/2010

    OPINION - President Obama should respond to the oil gushing from the depths of the Gulf of Mexico as he would to a foreign invading army...

    > MORE

  • Ronda Racha Penrice

    Ronda Racha Penrice

    Author of African American History For Dummies

    Is 'blackface' always beyond the pale?

    12:05 PM on 06/04/2010

    OPINION - Blackface is not going anywhere anytime soon...

    > MORE

  • Earl Ofari Hutchinson

    Earl Ofari Hutchinson

    Journalist, author and broadcaster.

    Why Democrats are the greatest danger to Obama's agenda

    11:44 AM on 06/04/2010

    OPINION - President Obama's deadliest enemy is not Sarah Palin, GOP congressional obstructionists, the Republican National Committee or even Fox News...

    > MORE

    Visit our Other Blogs and Join Our Family!

    Your Black World

    Black Scholars Blog

    Black Political Blog

    Black News Blog

    clip_image002

    Follow us on Twitter!




  • Julianne Malveaux: Our Jobless Recovery

    Our economy generated about 431,000 jobs last month. Good news? Only if you don't count the fact that more than 400,000 of the jobs were temporary jobs connected to collecting data for the Census. Those jobs won't last for long and when the dust clears the current 9.7 percent unemployment rate, down from 9.9 percent a month ago, is likely to rise again.

    Still, those who are desperate for good news are clinging to the fact that there are more jobs out there. What they don't understand is that people are looking for something more than a few months of work here and there. Nearly seven million Americans have been out of work for more than half a year. What has this done to their finances?

    Of course the situation is worse for African Americans, even though black unemployment dropped from 16.5 to 15.5 percent last month. The 15.5 percent is a modest estimate of what is really happening. The U6 number in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Situation report includes discouraged workers, those working part time that really want full time work and others peripherally connected to the labor market. That number dropped last month from 17.1 to 16.6 percent for the overall population. While the BLS does not report the number for African Americans, using the same relationships, the African American U6 number is at least 25.6 percent. That means that one in four African Americans is jobless!

    This jobless recovery means that some economists are willing and able to have conversations about the way the economy is turning around, even as only a few people feel the impact of the turnaround? Some of the numbers do look good, but the numbers that matter - the unemployment rate numbers, are stuck. How can the economy recover without generating jobs and what does this mean in the long run? We should all be apprehensive about public policy that does not embrace job creation, because at the basis of economic viability is an individual's ability to earn and spend. Without jobs, that just won't happen.

    As an economist, my focus on the labor market is usually about work and pay. Several experiences in the last few months have forced me to focus, also, on the human consequences of high unemployment, including the mental health consequences of being jobless in a culture that says that what you do is who you are. I met a woman who had been downsized from her job at 61. She told me, despondently, that she would probably never work again because of her age. Her aura was one of someone battered and lifeless. She asked me, a stranger, why her company could have done that to her. Part of me wanted to ask if she ever read the headlines. Part of me wanted to give her a hug.

    A young white man who is a 2009 graduate of a prestigious college delivered my room service, just a few days ago. Personable and positive, he shared, as we talked, that he worked about 20 hours a week at the hotel. His major is communications, but after sending out more than 100 resumes and tapes, he has no jobs offers. So he is waiting tables, delivering room service, keeping his chin up, and quietly dying. He said he could hardly bear to look at his dad, a man who had invested in his education. "I'm still living at home," he told me. "I should be out doing things."

    This crisis knows no race or gender, but African americans are being hit harder than most. Public policy has to address this. It is unconsciounable that we should talk economic recovery while people are not working, while people are suffering. And we have to consider the many ways our society pains because of joblessness. There is a malaise that has infected our society because of this high unemployment. Our mental and emotional health has been affected by this unemployment. And we are all to quiet about it because we don't know what to do next. Here is what we must do - we must push our legislators to address high unemployment. And we must protect the long term unemployed by extending their long-term benefits. A jobless recovery is no recovery, but instead it is a joke.

     

    Dr. Julianne Malveaux is an economist, author and commentator, and the Founder & Thought Leader of Last Word Productions, Inc., a multimedia production company.

    Last Word Productions, Inc. is a multimedia production company that serves as a vehicle for the work and products of Dr. Julianne Malveaux. For the last 10 years the company has centered its efforts on Dr. Malveaux's public speaking appearances, her work as a broadcast and print journalist, and also as an author. Currently, Julianne Malveaux is President of Bennett College For Women in Greensboro, North Carolina.

    To find more of Dr. Julianne Malveaux's columns, work and appearances please visit:

    www.juliannemalveaux.com




    Dr. Boyce Watkins: No More Arizona News for a While, Please

    Arizona isn't the only state with a racist agenda

    by Dr. Boyce Watkins, Syracuse University

    Forgive me for saying this, but part me of is getting sick of hearing about Arizona. Most states only get a few days in the news cycle, but since the politicians in Arizona were crazy enough to pass a law to stifle illegal immigration in their state, our news has been seemingly flooded with one story after another about Arizona: A politician in Arizona has links to the KKK, Arizona changes its textbooks to downplay people of color, brown faces are lightened up on a mural in Arizona. It never seems to stop.

    OK, I think I get the point: Arizona is a state with racist policies, at least more racist than most. Can we try to move onto something else now?

    This isn't to say that there is not a level of seriousness to the illegal immigration situation in Arizona. We've figured that out. The federal government has long refused to properly enforce immigration laws, and the residents of Arizona came up with their own response, one that threatens to undermine the civil rights of every black and brown person in the state. Got it.

    To some extent, the national attack on the state of Arizona smells a bit like political narcissism. The collective outrage that some have expressed over the civil liberties issues in the Arizona immigration law has been hardly present during other more serious racial atrocities that have occurred over the past 20 years.

    The sense of urgency that President Obama had about the passage of the state's new immigration law has never been matched when confronting the fact that the United States incarcerates over five times more black men than South Africa did during the height of apartheid. Attorney General Eric Holder's investigation into the legality of Arizona's political decisions was never preceded by a similar investigation into the civil rights abuses of unequal funding for inner city public schools. It seems that when civil liberties of a broad Latino base were attacked, the whole country went up in arms. But when black folks have been getting abused, our needs have been put at the bottom of the to-do list.

    Click to read




    Black Girl Kicked Out of Class for Having "Stinky" Black Hair Products

    A black girl is kicked out of her class for having hair that makes her teacher sick. ;

    Saturday, June 5, 2010

    Obama Needs to Lead on the Oil Spill

    by Professor Ron Daniels

    Clearly British Petroleum Oil Company (BP) is responsible for the most disastrous oil spill in U.S. history and must be held fully accountable for its negligent behavior. Beyond overseeing the crisis and ensuring that BP is deploying the necessary resources to stop the flow of oil and clean-up the damaged beaches and marshlands, there is precious little President Obama can do to clean up the mess. However, I agree with New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman and other commentators that the crisis presents the President with an opportunity to offer bold and visionary leadership in terms of the future direction of the U.S. economy.

    Ever the pragmatist and craving “bi-partisan” support for his massive energy bill, prior to the horrific oil spill, Obama caved in to the McCain/Palin “drill baby drill” crowd and ordered more areas opened for off shore drilling. Earlier he threw another plum the Republicans way by placing priority on building new nuclear power plants. I strongly disagree with these decisions but chalk it up to Obama being Obama. It’s his inside the beltway method of trying to drag defiant Republicans to the legislative table at a time when they are out to create a “waterloo” moment by whatever means necessary to defeat him and advance their conservative agenda. However, the oil spill has potentially created a new political calculus.

    Now is the time for Obama to lead on several fronts. First he must understand that perception is reality. It doesn’t matter that BP is responsible for this catastrophe. Because of the enormity of the crisis, the American people want to see their President in charge. Hence, as some commentators have suggested, it would be helpful if Obama delivered a nationally televised address to describe the magnitude of the crisis and lay out a clear command structure for how the federal government will be managing BP’s efforts. State and local officials and the affected residents need to know who’s in charge of what, how to communicate their concerns and where to get correct information and/or a decision. Second, Obama needs to be much more engaged with the people when he visits the Gulf region. Dropping in for three hours, walking along a beach to pick up a few oil blobs and then meeting with elected officials just won’t get it. He needs to show more empathy with the common folk, and that means getting into a boat owned by one of the locals to personally view spoiled wetlands; spending time with some of the fishermen, small business owners; and, touching some of the workers whose lives are being ruined by this debacle. The nation needs to see their President touching and interacting with the affected people.

    Equally important, President Obama should view the gigantic oil spill as a teachable moment to educate the American people about his vision for a more energy efficient and sustainable economy, a green economy with alternatives to fossil fuels that can generate millions of new jobs. And, as Thomas Friedman has argued for years, such a vision and approach would dramatically lessen U.S. dependence on foreign sources for oil. That education must begin with an expose of the reckless behavior of a corporation and industry that consistently places profits over the interests and security of workers and the nation. The debacle in the Gulf demonstrates that it only takes one spill to wreak havoc on an entire region in terms of the devastating effects on fish, wildlife, ecosystems and the livelihood of people. Frankly, I was shocked to learn that there are thousands of off shore oil rigs in the Gulf, any one of which could potentially spring a leak at any time -- particularly given the lax regulation of the energy industry under Bush-Cheney. BP had more than 700 hundred violations and its own internal memoranda indicate concerns about the safety of the rig that ultimately exploded.

    The problem is that the giant oil companies, like the giant banks and financial institutions, loathe regulation. They want free rein to maximize profits by minimizing cost including having to comply with regulations. Accordingly, they spend big bucks to enlist the services of lobbyists and buy-up politicians to promote and protect their interests. BP’s criminal behavior offers Obama and the Democrats (those who are not already bought and paid for by the oil companies) an opportunity to drive this point home as a basis for building momentum for a new energy policy.

    Finally, the dangers of off shore drilling have been made crystal clear. So, Obama need not fear the “drill baby drill” proponents any longer. One of his great gifts during the campaign (which he has rarely shown during his tenure in office) was the capacity to use his oratorical skills to inspire people to envision a greater good for themselves, their families and the nation. There is no greater challenge facing the nation and the planet in the 21st century than making the decisive shift to a green economy. It is far more important than JFK’s challenge to the American people after the Soviet Union forged ahead in the race in space with the launching of Sputnik. It would certainly be wonderful to hear this President both educate and challenge the American people to be at the forefront of the ‘new frontier” of creating a green economy. But, this will require confronting the oil industry head-on, admonishing the American people to envision life beyond addiction to fossil fuels and the audacity to mount a national mobilization to create a new way of life in this country, a green America. Once again President Obama has been presented with an opportunity to have his leadership match his vision and rhetoric. The question is will he seize the moment.

    Dr. Ron Daniels is President of the Institute of the Black World 21st Century and Distinguished Lecturer at York College City University of New York. His articles and essays also appear on the IBW website www.ibw21.org and www.northstarnews.com . To send a message, arrange media interviews or speaking engagements, Dr. Daniels can be reached via email at info@ibw21.org .

    # # #




    Friday, June 4, 2010

    Dr. Boyce Watkins Talks College Enrollment Rates for African American Males on CNN's HLN

    Dr. Boyce Watkins Talks College Enrollment Rates for African American Males on CNN's HLN

    Thursday, June 3, 2010

    Congressional Black Caucus Makes Interesting Moves

    The CBC makes an interesting move. ;Dr. Boyce and Lola discuss.

    Was Aiyana Jones' Death a Coverup?

    Dr. Boyce and Lola discuss Aiyana Jones and allegations of a coverup.

    Tuesday, June 1, 2010

    Dr. Boyce Watkins and Rev. Al Sharpton Discuss Glen Beck's Attack of Malia

    Dr. Boyce Watkins and Rev. Al Sharpton Discuss Glen Beck's Attack of Malia

    Monday, May 31, 2010

    Setting the Record Straight: A Response to Henry Louis Gates, Jr.

    Statement by the Committee to Advance the Movement for Reparations

    We, the undersigned, take strong exception to the Op-Ed, “Ending the Slavery Blame-Game,” published in the New York Times, April 23, 2010 by Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. There are gross errors, inaccuracies and misrepresentations in Gates’ presentation of the transatlantic European enslavement system. Moreover, we are duly concerned about his political motivations and find offensive his use of the term “blame game.” It trivializes one of the most heinous crimes against humanity—the European enslavement of African people. Gates contradicts his stated purpose of “ending” what he refers to as a “blame-game,” by erroneously making African rulers and elites equally responsible with European and American enslavers. He shifts the “blame” in a clear attempt to undermine the demand for reparations.

    The African Holocaust or Maafa, as it is referred to by many, is a crime against humanity and is recognized as such by the United Nations, scholars, and historians who have documented the primary and overwhelming culpability of European nations for enslavement in Europe, in the Americas and elsewhere. In spite of this overwhelming documentation, Gates inexplicably shifts the burden of culpability to Africans who were and are its victims. The abundance of scholarly work also affirms that Europeans initiated the process, established the global infrastructure for enslavement, and imposed, financed and defended it, and were the primary beneficiaries of it in various ways through human trafficking itself, banking, insurance, manufacturing, farming, shipping and allied enterprises.

    No serious scholar of African history or reparations activist denies the collaboration of some African rulers, elites, merchants and middlemen. Indeed, collaboration accompanies oppression as a continuing fact of history. Historians have described collaborators in two other major Holocausts: the Jewish Holocaust and the Native American Holocaust. Yet Gates, ignoring the historical record, makes the morally unacceptable error of conflating three distinct groups involved in the Holocaust of enslavement: perpetrators, collaborators and victims. The Jewish Holocaust had its Judenräte, Jewish councils which chose Jews for enslaved labor and for the death camps and facilitated their transport to them, as well as its kapos, Jewish camp overseers, who brutalized their fellow prisoners along with the SS guards. In the Native American Holocaust, there were also Native American collaborators who fought with the Whites to defeat, dispossess and dominate other Native Americans. Thus, such collaboration in oppression is not unique to Africa and Africans.

    Gates makes it clear that the article is written in the context of “post-racial posturing,” eagerly set forth by a nation citing its first Black president as false evidence of the declining significance of race and racism. Indeed, this is a period of resurgent racism reflected in the rise of the Tea Party movement, increasing hostility toward immigrants, open public recommitments to embracing and celebrating the history of racial oppression, joined with the fostering of fear to facilitate the continued denial of civil and human rights.

    The purpose for Gates’ misrepresentation of the historical record is to undermine the African and African descendant reparations movement, and to make it appear to be based on unfounded demands. An accurate reporting of the history of the Holocaust of enslavement and the period of segregation and other forms of oppression which followed it, attests to the importance, in fact, the essentiality of reparations. The widespread opposing responses to Gates and the anti-reparations interests and sentiments he represents in his article, provides us with an excellent opportunity to renew the just demand for reparations for centuries of enslavement and continued economic disadvantage and exploitation Black people endured in the Jim Crow era and subsequent years of wage slavery.

    Gates’ flawed and misconstrued presentation of the global reparations movement to redress the injuries of the Holocaust of enslavement and subsequent labor exploitation attempts to leave the reader with the impression that the movement is only a product of misguided African Americans. However, legal battles regarding reparations for the European enslavement of Africans are being waged throughout the United States, Jamaica, Brazil, South Africa, The Virgin Islands, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Martinique, Canada, Namibia and Barbados. The United Nations declaration that 2011 is the International Year of People of African Descent will afford yet another opportunity to expand the reparations movement for the longest unpunished crime against humanity --- the European enslavment of African people. In this country, reparations scholars, activists and others will continue their efforts in support of the House Judiciary Committee, HR-40, which calls for a study of the economic, cultural and psychological impact of enslavement on United States citizens.

    The record of the United Nations World Conference Against Racism (WCAR), held in South Africa in 2001, offers additional evidence of the global reach and relevance of the reparations movement and the work of Africans and African descendants in Africa and throughout the African Diaspora. Gates’ omission of these efforts and WCAR seems to suggest either a deliberate misrepresentation or a reflection of his distance from contemporary political movements in the international African community.

    We, the undersigned, intellectuals, activists, artists, professionals, men and women from various fields of focus, assemble here from a call by the Institute of the Black World 21st Century united in our profound commitment to African people and with a long history of involvement in national and international issues involving Africa and people of African descent. Signing this letter is not simply to respond to Gates’ clear inaccuracies, misrepresentations and questionable timing, but rather to honor and defend the memory and interests of the victims of the Holocaust of enslavement. We have come together at this historical moment to bear continuing witness to this gross human injury and the continuing consequences of this catastrophic and horrific event and process, and reaffirm our renewed commitment to continue and intensify the struggle for reparative and social justice in this society and the world.

    Committee to Advance the Movement for Reparations

    Rick Adams Dr. Leonard Jeffries

    Atty. Adjoa Aiyetoro Sister Viola Plummer

    Dr. Molefi Kete Asante Brother James Rodgers

    Herb Boyd Atty. Nkechi Taifa

    Dr. Iva Carruthers Dr. James Turner

    Dr. Ron Daniels Dr. Ife Williams

    Dr. Jeanette Davidson Dr. Ray Winbush

    Dr. Maulana Karenga Dr. Conrad Worrill

    Signatories

    Adisa Alkebulan, San Diego State, President, Diopian Institute

    Dr. Mario Beatty, Chair, African American Studies, Chicago State University

    Keith Beauchamp, filmmaker

    Dr. Melanie Bratcher, University of Oklahoma

    Dr. Sundiata Keita, Cha-Jua, President of National Council for Black Studies

    Dr. Lupe Davidson, University of Oklahoma

    Dr. Joy DeGruy, author of "The Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome"

    Dr. Daryl Harris, Howard University

    Eddie Harris, filmmaker

    Juliette Hubbard, Australian Aboriginal Activist

    Rev. Dr. Bernice Powell Jackson, North American President World Council of Churches

    Iya Marilyn Kai Jewett, Progressive Images Marketing Communications

    Darryl Jordan, American Friends Service Center-Third World Coalition

    Prof. Chad Dion Lassiter President, Black Men at Univ. of Penn School of Social Work, Inc

    Haki Madhubuti, President/CEO, Third World Press

    Dr. Emeka Nwadiora, Temple University

    Dr. Patricia Reid Merritt, Stockton State University

    Dr. Segun Shabaka, National Association of Kawaida Organizations--New York

    Dr. Michael Simanga, Fulton County Arts Council, Atlanta

    James Lance Taylor, President of National Conference of Black Political Scientists

    Dr. Christel Temple, University of Maryland

    Dr. Ronald Walters, Professor Emeritus, University of Maryland

    Dr. Valethia Watkins, Chair, African American Studies, Olive Harvey College

    Dr. Komozi Woodard, Sarah Lawrence College

    Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Pastor Emeritus, Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago

    Atty. Faya Rose Sanders, President, National Voting Rights Museum, Selma, AL

    Leonard Dunston, President Emeritus, National Association of Black Social Workers

    Betty Dopson, Committee to Eliminate Media Offensive to African People

    Bob Law, National Radio Personality

    Contact Information

    Press Inquiries and Interviews via Herb Boyd: 917.291.1825 - Email: herbboyd47@gmail.com

    General Information and/or Responses: 888.774.2921 - Email. info@ibw21.org




    Thursday, May 27, 2010

    Dr. Boyce and Lola: Kwame Kilpatrick's Rise and Fall

    Dr. Boyce and Lola discuss former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and his rise/fall from American politics

    Bill O'Reilly says Black Scholar Looks Like a Drug Dealer

    Bill O'Reilly says Marc Lamont Hill looks like a drug dealer. ;

    CNN Apologizes for Playing a Song with the "N-word"

    CNN apologizes for playing a song with the N-word. ;

    Dr. Boyce Watkins and Rev. Al Sharpton on Aiyana Jones and Other Current Issues

    Dr. Boyce Watkins and Rev. Al Sharpton on Aiyana Jones and Other Current Issues

    Tuesday, May 25, 2010

    Busty Black Barbie Causes Controversy

    Why is the black barbie the one the company chooses to oversexualize?

    Teacher Makes Students Dress as KKK Members

    What was she thinking?

    Are the Oil Spills Going to be Barack Obama's Katrina?

    The spills are expected to last for months - this could hurt the Obama Presidency.

    Monday, May 24, 2010

    Black News: Killer of Three Black College Students Convicted

    by Dr. Boyce Watkins, The Institute for Black Public Policy

    Nearly three years ago, two black college students and a friend were murdered in a schoolyard in Newark, NJ. Monday, a jury returned guilty verdicts for three of the murders and one attempted murder after deliberating for less than a day.
    Rodolfo Godinez, a 26-year old gang member and native of Nicaragua, was convicted of all charges against him, including multiple counts of robbery, weapons possession and conspiracy. He can get up to 30 years to life for each murder count, and the sentences can be given out consecutively.
    "This man will never see the light of day," said Robert D. Laurino, the acting Essex County prosecutor.
    Sentencing for Godinez is set for July 8. His lawyer, Roy Greenman, said,"Obviously, there will be an appeal on a number of grounds," but he declined to state the grounds on which he'd be filing.
    The prosecution did not assert that Godinez was the one who hacked at the victims with a machete or shot each of them execution-style, in the back of the head. He was argued, however, to be the one who summoned the other gang members to the schoolyard on the night when the murders took place. The murders were particularly chilling because all four of the victims were "good kids" with no criminal history and educational plans for the future.

    Click to read

     

    Find more black news at:

    Your Black World

    Black Scholars Blog

    Black Political Blog

    Black News Blog




    The Willie Horton Attack Ad: Black Males Presented as Criminals

    Remember this?

    Venus Williams' French Open Outfit - Sexy or Trashy?

    Venus Williams shocks the world with an outfit that looks like something you might buy in Victoria's secret.

    Julianne Malveaux Breaks Down Obama's Financial Reform

    Financial Reform-The Devil's In The Details

    By Julianne Malveaux

    Late last week, the United States Senate passed a financial reform bill by a vote of 59-39. Two Democrats crossed party lines, as did four Republicans to come up with the result. Now, the House, which has already passed financial reform legislation, and the Senate, will have to reconcile their versions of the bill. Now is the time for consumer advocates and others to counter the aggressive lobbying that will be done by banks and the auto industry to minimize the effects of legislation. This may also be an opportunity for the Congressional Black Caucus to raise its voice on the side of the many consumers who have been damaged by this financial crisis. While legislation is not meant to look backwards, but instead forward to prevent future crises, the CBC are among those who advocate for the least and the left out. Their perspective on financial regulation is badly needed.

    The House would create a consumer protection agency that is freestanding; the Senate would house the agency inside the Federal Reserve Bank. In some ways having the Fed run consumer protection is like having the fox patrol the chicken coop. Isn't this the same Fed that was part and parcel of the 2008 financial meltdown, the same Fed (then led by Alan Greenspan) that turned a blind eye to predatory and sub-prime lending and the market distortions that emerged from the packaging of substandard loan paper? The Federal Reserve theoretically already deals with regulation around credit cards and mortgages and to date they've not done a good job. What will change when they now have a consumer protection agency? Hearings, anyone?

    Click to read more




    reBlog from thegrio.com: Oil spill leaves both political parties in the muck

    I found this fascinating quote today:



    Palin has apparently forgotten that she and John McCain took nearly three times more money from the oil and gas industry than Obama and even coined the phrase "drill baby, drill" as part of the 2008 election cycle. In fact, 75 percent of the $238.7 million in political donations from the oil and gas industry have gone to Republican candidates. It seems that the woman who didn't know that Africa is a continent also doesn't know who pays the bills in her own party.thegrio.com, Oil spill leaves both political parties in the muck, May 2010



    You should read the whole article.

    Sunday, May 23, 2010

    Aiyana Jones Death, Lawrence Taylor Rape Case

    Dr. Boyce Watkins discusses the killing of Aiyana Jones and the rape case of Lawrence Taylor.

    Friday, May 21, 2010

    Dr: Boyce Watkins on MSNBC Discusses: Would Rand Paul roll back the Civil Rights Act?

    Dr: Boyce Watkins on MSNBC Discusses: Would Rand Paul roll back the Civil Rights Act?

    Monday, May 17, 2010

    Julianne Malveaux: Obama Disappoints Black Women with the Kagan Nomination

    I was among the many who were disappointed that President Barack Obama did not nominate an African American woman to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. After all, there are six white men, two women, one Latina and one white, and a nominal African American man on the Court.  Why not an African American woman?
    The Black Women's Roundtable, led by Melanie Campbell, was so disappointed that they shared their concerns with the President in a letter that spoke both to the contributions African American women have made and the qualifications of a few good women that President Obama should have considered before nominating Ms. Kagan to the nation's highest court.


    I won't even speak on what I perceive as some of the shortcomings of the Kagan nomination.  The Solicitor General has earned the support of some colleagues that I fully respect, such as Harvard Professor Charles Ogletree.  At the same time, we have to pause at the fact that her definition of diversity is ideological diversity, not racial and ethnic diversity, and that she seemed to make Harvard a more welcome place for conservatives, if not for African American faculty.

     

    Click to read




    Sunday, May 16, 2010

    Elena Kagan's Sexuality Questioned - Why?

    Elena Kagan's supporters don't do her or gay Americans any favors by publicly expressing their views on her sexual orientation. Whether or not a future justice is a heterosexual or homosexual is irrelevant to questions about fitness to serve on the Supreme Court. That there are some bigoted Americans who would make sexual orientation an issue is no reason to grant them any legitimacy, which occurs when their perverse and offensive interests are addressed. The proper response is to treat the question of sexual orientation as the non-issue that it is and place the burden on the bigots to make their case in the public square… if they dare.

     

    Click to read




    Saturday, May 15, 2010

    Miriam Harris: Elena Kagan's Weak Cultural Competence

    No one is more delighted than I am that esteemed presidential historian, Annette Gordon- Reed will join the faculty at Harvard Law School. Despite the fact that she was recruited by then Dean Elena Kagan, I respectfully disagree with Charles Ogletree that Elena Kagan is a good choice for the Supreme Court.

    Ogletree argues that from 2003 until the end of Kagan's deanship in 2009, the number of African American students matriculating rose to an all time high. I am sure this is accurate, but how relevant is it?

    Do these numbers speak to the quality and caliber of student life? Are Harvard graduates fully engaged and can they provide an effective and vigorous understanding with matters pertaining to race? Or, are they merely defenders and justifiers of the status quo?

    I suggest that Professor Ogletree look at the April 30, 2010 blog post written by Diane Lucas. Ms. Lucas was a guest blogger for FEMINISTE and authored a piece entitled, "The Racist Breeding Grounds of Harvard Law School". Lucas wrote this article to discuss the racist behavior of Stephanie Grace, a graduating student, and to discuss her own experience as a Black student at HLS. Lucas critiqued Kagan's leadership before she knew that Kagan was the U.S. Supreme Court nominee.

     

    Click to read




    Black Women's Leadership Groups Disappointed in Elena Kagan Appointment

    E KaganFrom Politic 365: The announcement of Elena Kagan could not really be called a surprise, since the White House went out of its way to all but announce her as their pick over the last week. The Obama Administration dropped hints by the dozens to their favored reporters, who dutifully shared their information with the rest of us. I had come to accept it as a done deal, even though I had been a little perturbed at the way the D.C. pundits only mentioned three or four names from the president's short list, as if the rest of the names on it, like Georgia's ownLeah Ward Sears, were invisible.

    It wasn't until I called a friend of mine, an African American lawyer here in Atlanta who had been a diehard Hillary supporter and then a reluctant Barack Obama supporter after he became the Democratic nominee, that I realized that others felt the same way. "First he puts a Hispanic woman on the court. Fine. He's paying back the Hispanics for their support," she said. "Then he puts a white woman on the court. Okay – he's paying them back for coming over to his side after Hillary lost. I see that.

    But why do I have to be last? Why do black women always have to be last? I don't think he cares."
    Where are the Sistahs? See Politic365 to find out




    Friday, May 14, 2010

    Dr. Boyce Watkins Debate President Obama's Choice For Supreme Court Nominee on MSNBC

    Dr. Boyce Watkins Debate President Obama's Choice For Supreme Court Nominee on MSNBC

    Dr. Boyce Watkins and Rev. Al Sharpton Discuss Obama's Supreme Court Nomination

    Dr. Boyce Watkins and Rev. Al Sharpton Discuss Obama's Supreme Court Nomination.

    Thursday, May 13, 2010

    Shocking Video: White Privilege Boot Camp

    Was this brother being excessively harsh or just truthful?

    Memoirs of a Black Latina - Starring Christina Mendez

    Check it out!

    Stop Comparing Elena Kagan to Thurgood Marshall: She's Not Him

     

    From Colorlines.org

    Obama’s second Supreme Court nominee clerked for one of history’s greatest racial justice champions. You wouldn’t know it by looking at her career since.

    Despite all the hubbub Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination will generate, the truth of the matter is Kagan won’t make much difference to a judicial balance of power that leans rightward. She’ll maintain the status quo: four reliably liberal justices, four reliably conservative justices and one center-right swing voter in Justice Anthony Kennedy. Importantly, that means she will also do little to alter the court’s rightward trajectory on racial justice.

    Both Kagan and the White House have made much of her time as a clerk for her self-described mentor, Thurgood Marshall. The hapless Republican National Committee has responded with a bizarre effort to tar her association with one of history’s most celebrated justices. But both sides overstate the connection. Kagan hasn't exactly spent her career as a champion of the racial justice principles Marshall articulated. We need to be asking why that’s the case.

    As a Democratic president’s nominee, to be confirmed by a Democratic Senate, we can expect a would-be Justice Kagan to align herself consistently with the liberal voting bloc. After all, today’s Supreme Court appointments rarely let down the presidents who nominate them. Sure, David Souter—whom a wise Latina replaced last summer—was the bane of George H.W. Bush’s existence because of his pro-choice opinions. And retiring Justice John Paul Stevens certainly grew, during his three and a half decades on the court, to become a disappointment for President Gerald Ford’s legacy. I just don’t see that happening to our current constitutional-law-professor president.  

    click to read




    Black News: African American Scholars Speaking Up on Elena Kagan

    by Dr. Boyce Watkins

    I started the day thinking about Elena Kagan, Barack Obama's most recent nominee to the Supreme Court. I was wondering how in the world the president could appoint someone who has no experience on the bench, given the number of highly qualified judges he had to choose from. Then I was informed that this might be a good thing, since the Republicans don't have a judicial record to scrutinize. No problemo.


    I then noticed that Kagan has past affiliations with The University of Chicago, The Harvard Law School and Goldman Sachs, and that she was appointed to her position at Harvard by Lawrence Summers, the head of the President's Council of Economic Advisors. I was starting to get uncomfortable at that point, because Kagan's appointment would mean that the entire Supreme Court would be filled with Harvard and Yale grads, which effectively says that every other law school in the country need not apply (so much for having a meritocracy). I also saw a very disturbing pattern of cronyism, elitism and Wall Street loyalty that lets us know that perhaps the President of Hope and Change is not quite what we ordered, making back room deals with his buddies, all for the sake of keeping American power locked into tiny social circles.

    Click to read




    Dr. Boyce Watkins on MSNBC: Obama's Bad Appointment to Supreme Court

    Dr. Boyce Watkins on MSNBC: Obama's Bad Appointment to Supreme Court

    Wednesday, May 12, 2010

    Black Scholars Keep Weighing in on Supreme Court Nominee, Elena Kagan

    by Dr. Wilmer Leon

    On Monday May 10th President Obama nominated Elena Kagan to replace retiring Associate Justice John Paul Stevens. Many see this selection as a prudent political move; as the sitting solicitor general, Ms. Kagan has already been vetted and confirmed by the current Senate. This means that President Obama will not have to expend much political capital in order to get his nominee approved.

    There are those who are questioning if not opposing the selection of Ms. Kagan for a number of different reasons. President Obama called her a "trailblazing leader… " and stated "Elena is widely regarded as one of the nation's foremost legal minds … " Some believe that while former President George W. Bush was eroding constitutional protections, Ms. Kagen, this “trailblazing leader” was conspicuously silent.

    Others question Ms. Kagan’s record of minority hiring while dean of Harvard University’s Law School. During her tenure Dean Kagan hired 32 tenured and tenure-track academic faculty members. Of these, 25 were white men, 6 white women, and one Asian American woman. During her six years in the position there were no African American or Latinos hired. Just 3% of her hires were non-white. It is important to note that according to Harvard’s 2009 Annual Report the entire Harvard faculty consists of 26% female, 3% African American, and 3% Latino.

    Click to read more




    Marc Lamont Hill Analyzes Elena Kagan

    by Dr. Marc Lamont Hill

    Yesterday, President Obama nominated United States Solicitor General Elena Kagan to replace John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court. Few were surprised by the choice, as Kagan has long been viewed a frontrunner for the high court. While many observers have applauded Obama’s decision, others like myself were left with a lingering question.
    Is this really the best we could do?
    Let’s be clear, I am not questioning Kagan’s basic qualifications as a nominee. Unlike those who have questioned her “temperament” and “intellectual curiosity”—loaded queries that only seem to get raised in relation to women and minority candidates—I have little doubt about Kagan’s fitness for the job. Rather, I am concerned about Kagan’s ability to fill John Paul Stevens’ shoes as the progressive anchor of the Supreme Court.
    Although she undoubtedly shares the same political persuasion as Justice Stevens, Kagan is considerably less progressive on major issues of the day. While Stevens has filed numerous dissents in an effort to challenge the Bush (and now Obama) doctrine of endless executive power, Kagan has dutifully argued in favor of policies that undermine the spirit and letter of the Constitution. For example, during her confirmation hearing for Solicitor General, Kagan offered unequivocal support for the indefinite detention of suspected terrorists as well as the bizarre belief that the entire world is a battleground. On other issues, from gay marriage to civil rights, Kagan has done nothing to inspire confidence that she would continue Stevens’ tradition of principled and rigorous resistance.
    The choice of Kagan is even more disappointing when examining the other viable option. Diane Wood, a highly respected judge who currently sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, has a long and successful record of defending the Constitution from the onslaught of right-wing jurists. Also, like Justice Stevens, Wood has also demonstrated the ability to persuade conservative judges to change their opinion on controversial cases. In addition, Wood’s Protestant faith and non-Ivy League education would have added another layer of diversity to the court. While Wood was certainly a more contentious choice, there is little doubt that she would have been confirmed by the Democrat-controlled Senate.
    True to form, political pragmatists have claimed that Kagan was the best choice available. By choosing a relatively moderate nominee, they argue, Obama effectively prevents the Right from turning the confirmation hearings into a political spectacle designed to make both Kagan and Obama look like ideological extremists. While this argument is theoretically sound, it rests upon the native expectation that the Republican Party operates in good faith.
    They do not.

     

    Click to read




    Black Law Professors disturbed by Elena Kagan's Nomination by Obama

    AP photo/Jose Luis Magana

    Reports suggest that Solicitor General Elena Kagan may be President Obama's choice for the Supreme Court vacancy.

    Like everyone in the legal academy over the last decade, we have watched with admiration the amazing changes that Elena Kagan brought to Harvard Law School. A fractured faculty, divided among ideological lines, seemed finally content, if not united. A boisterous student body was finally pacified. The logjam that had stopped faculty hiring had burst. Indeed, she hired so many new faculty the Harvard Law School’s newspaper’s 2008 April Fool’s issue declared, "Dean Kagan Hires Every Law Professor in the Country."

    The first woman Dean of Harvard Law School had presided over an unprecedented expansion of the faculty -- growing it by almost a half. She had hired 32 tenured and tenure-track academic faculty members (non-clinical, non-practice). But when we sat down to review the actual record, we were frankly shocked. Not only were there shockingly few people of color, there were very few women. Where were the people of color? Where were the women? Of these 32 tenured and tenure-track academic hires, only one was a minority. Of these 32, only seven were women. All this in the 21st Century.

     

    Click to read




    Lawrence Taylor Should Only Be Judged After We see the Evidence

    lawrence_taylor_rape

    by Dr. Boyce Watkins, The Institute for Black Public Policy

    Former New York Giant Lawrence Taylor has had a life that has been shameful, exciting, devastating and amazing.  He has seen the highest of highs and the lowest of lows, whether you are referring to his physical prowess or his battle with drug addiction.  I can’t, for one second, pretend that I know how difficult it is to walk away from crack cocaine, but I believe thatLawrence Taylor had the strength to do it.

    RELATED: Teen In LT’s Rape Case “Doesn’t Want To Ruin His Reputation”

    I was proud to see Taylor rebuild his life after spending quite a few years making one mistake after another.  Just like on the football field, I wanted to see him succeed.  And he was succeeding, at least for a while.  Then came the rape allegations.

    Click to read




    Sunday, May 9, 2010

    Black Unemployment Remains Strong in April - What are We to Do?

    by Dr. Boyce Watkins - The Institute for Black Public Policy

     

    Persistently high black unemployment remains a problem here in the United States, as the latest report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that African Americans have an unemployment rate of 16.5 percent, compared to 9 percent for white Americans. This rate remains the same as last month, even though the economy created 290,000 jobs during the month of April.
    White unemployment rose slightly from last month's rate of 8.8 percent, but black unemployment is still over 80 percent higher than that of White Americans.
    Black women saw their unemployment number rise to 13.7 percent from 12.4 percent last month. This number is 85 percent higher than the unemployment rate for white women, which is at 7.4 percent. Black males are at the bottom of the barrel, with an unemployment rate of 18 percent, which is 95 percent higher than that for white men.
    Black teen unemployment also continues to be a problem. African American teenagers saw their unemployment rate drop from 41.1 percent to 37.3 percent. But this number is 58 percent higher than a white teen unemployment rate of 23.5 percent.
    Some argue that President Obama and Congress must do something to help with the black unemployment situation. The Congressional Black Caucus is urging the passage of a $1.5 billion dollar jobs bill to reduce black teen unemployment in order to curb youth violence. Violence among teens tends to increase during the summer months, when kids are out of school.

     

    Click to read




    Friday, May 7, 2010

    Dr. Boyce Watkins Talks About "Policing Wall Street" On Michael Eric Dyson

    Dr. Boyce Watkins Talks About "Policing Wall Street" On Michael Eric Dyson

    Newspaper Compares the Obamas to Fred Sanford and Aunt Esther

    Long Island Newspaper Smithtown Messenger Compares Obamas To Sanford Son


    Dr. Boyce And The Ladies Sound Off on Celebrity Infidelity

    Dr. Boyce Talks to The Ladies As They Sound Off on Celebrity Infidelity

    Wednesday, May 5, 2010

    Obama Family Portrayed as Sanford and Son in Newspaper

    by Dr. Boyce Watkins, Syracuse University

    Phillip Sciarello, a publisher and part owner of the Smithtown Messenger in Long Island, is defending his newspaper after a picture appeared that some believe to be a racist stereotype of the first family. The picture depicts Barack and Michelle Obama as characters from "Sanford and Son." The public backlash has led the paper to announce that it will issue a retraction in its next edition.
    The picture is part of a "before and after" sequence of the last six presidents, showing how much they age once they get into the White House. The "after" photo of the Obamas show Barack Obama as Fred Sanford (Redd Foxx) and Michelle Obama as Aunt Esther (LaWanda Page). The characters are standing ready to fight, as was typical on the 1970s television show.The pictures led the Brookhaven town board to remove one of the company's sister publications, the Brookhaven Review, as an official newspaper. This means that the paper will no longer publish town government notices.
    "The reference to racial stereotypes is where the line was crossed," Brookhaven Supervisor Mark Lesko said to Newsday.
    Hazel N. Dukes, president of the state NAACP conference, stated that the county should pull advertising from any publication that runs the photo.

     

    Click to read




    Monday, May 3, 2010

    Athletes Get Nothing from NCAA's New $11 Billion Dollar Contract

    The NCAA men's basketball tournament is expanding, starting next season, but not on the large scale once expected.

    The sport's signature event will grow to 68 teams from 65 in conjunction with a new 14-year, nearly $11 billion television agreement with CBS and Turner Sports announced Thursday. That gives the NCAA a 41% hike in annual media and marketing rights connected to the tournament — and "financial stability through the first quarter of this century," interim President Jim Isch said — without the controversy of a more dramatic move to a 96-team bracket.

    Negotiations with CBS/Turner, ESPN and Fox Sports initially had targeted a 96-team field, drawing concern and criticism from traditionalists and others over the impact on the tournament's aesthetics, effect on college basketball's regular season and conference tournaments and potential for further intrusion on players' time and studies.

     

    Click to read